Substack's Double Moderation Standards: Nazis Are Okay But AI Is Not
Substack will not moderate it's platform when it comes to Nazis and fascists but it will for artificial intelligence. It's a head scratcher for sure.
Chris Best, the CEO of Substack, the popular platform for writing and monetizing newsletters (and more), has made it abundantly clear that the platform isn't going to moderate hate speech from self-proclaimed Nazis and fascists on it's platform.
What Best and his team will do is moderate content generated by AI on the platform. Because after all that's the bigger issue here... Right?! (yes, I'm being sarcastic.)
He writes:
“It’s getting harder to tell what’s real on the internet [and that] when content made by no one takes over parts of the internet that are supposed to be human, it pollutes the commons and makes it hard to discover and hear human voices.”
Yes, but some of those human voices are vile and repugnant!
Best's public stance on content moderation has created a significant policy contradiction that undermines the platform's integrity.
This absolutist position is now directly contradicted by a new, targeted mandate to moderate AI-generated content, which must be tagged or will be removed from the platform.
It's this selective enforcement creates a clear values hierarchy: the platform is more concerned with the method of content creation (AI) than the substance of the content itself (hate speech), exposing a critical flaw in its strategic positioning.
The Stated Thesis: Non-Interference
- The Principle: As articulated by CEO Chris Best, Substack's official stance is that it is not in the business of moderating content.
- The Application: This policy has been used to justify the continued presence of extremist content, including newsletters from "Nazis and alt-right" figures.
The Contradictory Antithesis: AI Moderation
- The New Rule: The platform announced it will now moderate for the use of Artificial Intelligence in writing.
- The Enforcement: Content created with AI must be explicitly tagged, with the implication of removal if it is not compliant.
The platform is now in the weird position of actively policing the tools of expression (AI) while refusing to police the content of expression (hate speech).
So here's the question... Is Substack moderating content or not?
The selective application suggests the "non-moderation" stance is not a principle but a convenience. Or worse?
The Argument: I Don't Like It, But All Platforms Have This Issue?
The argument that all platforms have a Nazi problem is so beyond stupid. By publishing on the Substack platform your supporting the spread of Nazi and fascist hate speech.
Yes, your little newsletter about gardening or tech if published on Substack is fueling the problem.
You don't like it? Move your newsletter! There are tons of better options out there that both function better and don't platform hate.
-Seth Goldstein
The Latest From The Entrepreneur's Enigma Podcast

I Was A Guest On AI Hope with Geoff Livingston!


Sponsor

Looking for guests? Want to be on podcasts? Check out Podmatch! I use it for both getting on podcasts and finding quality guests. It's well worth it and affordable too!
Web Jawn
Curated By Seth Goldstein
I tend to agree.

We're in a new age folks. This is only the beginning.

Thanks to AI... hmmm. Most of these bug wouldn't have been found in the first place if it wasn't AI finding them. So double edged sword if you ask me.

This looks intriguing.

Probably a good thing that the EU and its multiple markets look beyond just what US search can provide.

Interesting and thought provoking post from Jeff Jarvis, who has been talking about AI on the podcasts Intelligent Machines and AI Inside for years. He's well equipped to talk on this topic.

Geoff Livingston has his finger on the pulse of AI. This is a good read.
This could be useful. Also could be abused too.

John Oliver is freaking brilliant as is Molly White.

When did it ever stop being fun? There's nothing wrong with being a Luddite.

So surprised. 🤪

Kind of gross. 😜

Nice and done right!

None of these people are podcasters first. Please realize that.

Truth. Danny Brown would know.
This is Anthropic just being sloppy with their testing. That's it. Do better Anthropic.

Snap wants human voices not AI Slop. Can't say I blame them, but still... let's see how long this lasts.

If you're not subbed to Casey Newton's Platformer newsletter, you need to go sub. It's worth every penny.

A good study by the gang at iPullRank!

Good grief. Bending Spoons strikes again.
Sponsor

Plaud, the world’s No.1 AI note-taking brand, exists to help people capture, extract, and utilize what you say, hear, see, and think.
Web Finds & Funny Stuff
Curated By Brian Griffiths





Neat site for a great show!

A gigapixel is a thing!


That's It For This Week! Keep Rocking It!
-Seth
Thanks for reading! If you're liking the newsletter and the content that I curate, please consider signing up for a pay-what-you-want subscription to help me continue to write this weekly newsletter.
















